Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1847
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1872
dc.contributor.author Keller, E.R. Joachim
dc.contributor.author Zanke, Christine D.
dc.contributor.author Senula, Angelika
dc.contributor.author Breuing, Andreas
dc.contributor.author Hardeweg, Bernd
dc.contributor.author Winkelmann, Traud
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-07T13:27:55Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-07T13:27:55Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.citation Keller, E.R.J.; Zanke, C.D.; Senula, A.; Breuing, A.; Hardeweg, B.; Winkelmann, T.: Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks. In: Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60 (2013), Nr. 3, S. 913-926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5
dc.description.abstract The maintenance of plant genetic resources in living plant collections (genebanks) causes costs due to employment of staff, usage of buildings, equipment and consumables. Since this is especially challenging in vegetatively propagated material, studies were performed for the case of garlic, which is one of the major vegetatively maintained crops in the genebank of IPK Gatersleben. Data were recorded to compare various scenarios of the main strategies field maintenance and cryopreservation. A spreadsheet tool was developed to be used for cost assessment and for drawing conclusions concerning the most effective way of maintenance. Field culture is cheaper in the short term, whereas after a break-even point cryopreservation becomes the more efficient storage method in the long term. This break-even point depends on the particular scenario, which is determined by various factors such as field and in vitro multiplication rates of various genotypes, presence of bulbils in a part of the genepool, the sample size of the accessions as well as the number of stored accessions in cryopreservation. The comparative discussion is exemplified for a 1-year field rotation versus cryopreservation using either in vitro plantlets or a combination of bulbils and unripe inflorescence bases as organ sources. For the more expensive use of in vitro plants cryopreservation becomes less costly than field culture only after 13 years, whereas this is the case already after 8-9 years when using a combination of bulbils in winter and inflorescence bases in summer. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Heidelberg : Springer Verlag
dc.relation.ispartofseries Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 60 (2013), Nr. 3
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Allium sativum eng
dc.subject Case study eng
dc.subject Cost factors eng
dc.subject Cryopreservation eng
dc.subject Field culture eng
dc.subject Long-term storage eng
dc.subject Vegetatively propagated germplasm eng
dc.subject comparative study eng
dc.subject conservation genetics eng
dc.subject cost-benefit analysis eng
dc.subject fieldwork eng
dc.subject genetic resource eng
dc.subject germplasm eng
dc.subject monocotyledon eng
dc.subject seasonality eng
dc.subject storage eng
dc.subject Germany eng
dc.subject.ddc 580 | Pflanzen (Botanik) ger
dc.title Comparing costs for different conservation strategies of garlic (Allium sativum L.) germplasm in genebanks eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 09259864
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-012-9888-5
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 3
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 60
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 913
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 926
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken