Comparison concept and quality metrics for GNSS antenna calibrations: Cause and effect on regional GNSS networks

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/14373
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/14490
dc.contributor.author Kersten, Tobias
dc.contributor.author Kröger, Johannes
dc.contributor.author Schön, Steffen
dc.date.accessioned 2023-07-31T07:00:10Z
dc.date.available 2023-07-31T07:00:10Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Kersten, T.; Kröger, J.; Schön, S.: Comparison concept and quality metrics for GNSS antenna calibrations: Cause and effect on regional GNSS networks. In: Journal of Geodesy 96 (2022), Nr. 7, 48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01635-8
dc.description.abstract Precise values for absolute receiver antenna phase centre corrections (PCC) are one prerequisite for high-quality GNSS applications. Currently, antenna calibrations are performed by different institutes using a robot in the field or in an anechoic chamber. The differences between the antenna patterns are significant and require a sound comparison concept and a detailed study to quantify the impact on geodetic parameters, such as station coordinates, zenith wet delays (ZWDs) or receiver clock estimates. Furthermore, a discussion on acceptable pattern uncertainties is needed. Therefore, a comparison strategy for receiver antenna calibration values is presented using a set of individually and absolutely calibrated Leica AR25 antennas from the European Permanent Network (EPN), both from the robot (Geo++ company) and from the chamber approach (University of Bonn). Newly developed scalar metrics and their benefits are highlighted and discussed in relation to further structural analysis. With our metrics, properties of 25 patterns pairs (robot/chamber) could be used to successfully assign seven individual groups. The impact of PCC on the estimated parameters depends on the PCC structure, its sampling by the satellite distribution and the applied processing parameters. A regional sub-network of the EPN is analysed using the double difference (DD) and the precise point positioning (PPP) methods. For DD, depending on the antenna category differences in the estimated parameters between 1 and 12 mm are identified also affecting the ZWDs. For PPP, the consistency of the observables, i.e. potential differences in the reference point of carrier phase and code observations, additionally affects the distribution among the different parameters and residuals. eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Heidelberg : Springer
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Geodesy 96 (2022), Nr. 7
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
dc.subject Antenna eng
dc.subject Calibration eng
dc.subject Carrier phase centre offset eng
dc.subject Carrier phase centre variation eng
dc.subject GNSS eng
dc.subject PCC eng
dc.subject PCO eng
dc.subject PCV eng
dc.subject PPP eng
dc.subject Regional GNSS networks eng
dc.subject.ddc 550 | Geowissenschaften
dc.title Comparison concept and quality metrics for GNSS antenna calibrations: Cause and effect on regional GNSS networks eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1432-1394
dc.relation.issn 0949-7714
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01635-8
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 7
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 96
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 48
dc.description.version publishedVersion eng
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich
dc.bibliographicCitation.articleNumber 48


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken