Evaluation of different calibration strategies for large scale continuous hydrological modelling

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/1357
dc.identifier.uri http://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/1382
dc.contributor.author Wallner, Markus
dc.contributor.author Haberlandt, Uwe
dc.contributor.author Dietrich, J.
dc.date.accessioned 2017-04-21T09:09:54Z
dc.date.available 2017-04-21T09:09:54Z
dc.date.issued 2012
dc.identifier.citation Wallner, M.; Haberlandt, U.; Dietrich, J.: Evaluation of different calibration strategies for large scale continuous hydrological modelling. In: Advances in Geosciences 31 (2012), S. 67-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-31-67-2012
dc.description.abstract For the analysis of climate impact on flood flows and flood frequency in macroscale river basins, hydrological models can be forced by several sets of hourly long-term climate time series. Considering the large number of model units, the small time step and the required recalibrations for different model forcing an efficient calibration strategy and optimisation algorithm are essential. This study investigates the impact of different calibration strategies and different optimisation algorithms on the performance and robustness of a semi-distributed model. The different calibration strategies were (a) Lumped, (b) 1-Factor, (c) Distributed and (d) Regionalisation. The latter uses catchment characteristics and estimates parameter values via transfer functions. These methods were applied in combination with three different optimisation algorithms: PEST, DDS, and SCE. In addition to the standard temporal evaluation of the calibration strategies, a spatial evaluation was applied. This was done by transferring the parameters from calibrated catchments to uncalibrated ones and validating the model performance of these uncalibrated catchments. The study was carried out for five sub-catchments of the Aller-Leine River Basin in Northern Germany. The best result for temporal evaluation was achieved by using the combination of the DDS optimisation with the Distributed strategy. The Regionalisation method obtained the weakest performance for temporal evaluation. However, for spatial evaluation the Regionalisation indicated more robust models, closely followed by the Lumped method. The 1-Factor and the Distributed strategy showed clear disadvantages regarding spatial parameter transferability. For the parameter estimation based on catchment descriptors as required for ungauged basins, the Regionalisation strategy seems to be a promising tool particularly in climate impact analysis and for hydrological modelling in general. eng
dc.description.sponsorship Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Göttingen : Copernicus GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofseries Advances in Geosciences 31 (2012)
dc.rights CC BY 3.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
dc.subject algorithm eng
dc.subject calibration eng
dc.subject flood eng
dc.subject hydrological modeling eng
dc.subject numerical model eng
dc.subject optimization eng
dc.subject river basin eng
dc.subject time series analysis eng
dc.subject Aller River eng
dc.subject Germany eng
dc.subject Lower Saxony eng
dc.subject.ddc 550 | Geowissenschaften ger
dc.subject.ddc 551 | Geologie, Hydrologie, Meteorologie ger
dc.title Evaluation of different calibration strategies for large scale continuous hydrological modelling
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.issn 1680-7340
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-31-67-2012
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 31
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 67
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 74
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken