A comparative review of peridynamics and phase-field models for engineering fracture mechanics

Zur Kurzanzeige

dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.15488/12915
dc.identifier.uri https://www.repo.uni-hannover.de/handle/123456789/13019
dc.contributor.author Diehl, Patrick
dc.contributor.author Lipton, Robert
dc.contributor.author Wick, Thomas
dc.contributor.author Tyagi, Mayank
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-02T12:21:15Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-02T12:21:15Z
dc.date.issued 2022
dc.identifier.citation Diehl, P.; Lipton, R.; Wick, T.; Tyagi, M.: A comparative review of peridynamics and phase-field models for engineering fracture mechanics. In: Computational mechanics : solids, fluids, engineered materials, aging infrastructure, molecular dynamics, heat transfer, manufacturing processes, optimization, fracture & integrity 69 (2022), Nr. 6, S. 1259-1293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02147-0
dc.description.abstract Computational modeling of the initiation and propagation of complex fracture is central to the discipline of engineering fracture mechanics. This review focuses on two promising approaches: phase-field (PF) and peridynamic (PD) models applied to this class of problems. The basic concepts consisting of constitutive models, failure criteria, discretization schemes, and numerical analysis are briefly summarized for both models. Validation against experimental data is essential for all computational methods to demonstrate predictive accuracy. To that end, the Sandia Fracture Challenge and similar experimental data sets where both models could be benchmarked against are showcased. Emphasis is made to converge on common metrics for the evaluation of these two fracture modeling approaches. Both PD and PF models are assessed in terms of their computational effort and predictive capabilities, with their relative advantages and challenges are summarized. © 2022, The Author(s). eng
dc.language.iso eng
dc.publisher Berlin ; Heidelberg : Springer
dc.relation.ispartofseries Computational mechanics : solids, fluids, engineered materials, aging infrastructure, molecular dynamics, heat transfer, manufacturing processes, optimization, fracture & integrity 69 (2022), Nr. 6
dc.rights CC BY 4.0 Unported
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Peridynamics eng
dc.subject Phase-field eng
dc.subject Validation studies eng
dc.subject.ddc 004 | Informatik ger
dc.subject.ddc 530 | Physik ger
dc.title A comparative review of peridynamics and phase-field models for engineering fracture mechanics eng
dc.type Article
dc.type Text
dc.relation.essn 1432-0924
dc.relation.doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-022-02147-0
dc.bibliographicCitation.issue 6
dc.bibliographicCitation.volume 69
dc.bibliographicCitation.firstPage 1259
dc.bibliographicCitation.lastPage 1293
dc.description.version publishedVersion
tib.accessRights frei zug�nglich


Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en):

Zur Kurzanzeige

 

Suche im Repositorium


Durchblättern

Mein Nutzer/innenkonto

Nutzungsstatistiken