Muñoz, E.; Álvarez, C.; Billib, Max; Arumí, J.L.; Rivera, D.: Comparison of gridded and measured rainfall data for basin-scale hydrological studies. In: Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 71 (2011), Nr. 3, S. 459-468. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392011000300018
Zusammenfassung: | |
Global gridded climatological (GGC) datasets, including precipitation and temperature, are becoming more and more precise, accessible, and common, but the utility of these datasets and their limits for hydrological research are still not well determined. In this paper, we compare the performance of two hydrological models that are identical in structure but built with two different inputs: rainfall from rain gauge stations and from a GGC dataset. The objective is to evaluate the utility of gridded datasets in water resource availability studies mainly for hydroelectric and agricultural purposes. The Andean basin of the Laja River, located in south-central Chile, was chosen for this study. It was based on an 18-yr simulation, and it was concluded that i) with gridded climatological datasets in a monthly water balance model, it is possible to reproduce the behavior of an Andean basin with good goodness-of-fit, but with worse results than when using inputs from rain gauges; ii) the amount of rainfall in gridded datasets in the Andean area of the Laja basin is underestimated and damped, an effect which is transferred to the simulated flows; and iii) regarding the main activities in the Laja basin, global gridded datasets are useful for hydrological studies with agricultural purposes prior to a treatment that considers the orographic effect. On the other hand, these datasets are useless for hydroelectric purposes due to the large underestimation of peak flows obtained during the rainy season. | |
Lizenzbestimmungen: | CC BY-NC 4.0 Unported |
Publikationstyp: | Article |
Publikationsstatus: | publishedVersion |
Erstveröffentlichung: | 2011 |
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en): | Fakultät für Bauingenieurwesen und Geodäsie |
Pos. | Land | Downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anzahl | Proz. | |||
1 | Germany | 201 | 59,82% | |
2 | Chile | 30 | 8,93% | |
3 | United States | 25 | 7,44% | |
4 | India | 14 | 4,17% | |
5 | China | 13 | 3,87% | |
6 | Italy | 6 | 1,79% | |
7 | No geo information available | 5 | 1,49% | |
8 | Mexico | 4 | 1,19% | |
9 | Canada | 4 | 1,19% | |
10 | Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 2 | 0,60% | |
andere | 32 | 9,52% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.