Back to the future: origins and directions of the “Agile Manifesto” – views of the originators

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Hohl, Philipp; Klünder, Jil; Bennekum, Arie van; Lockard, Ryan; Gifford, James et al.: Back to the future: origins and directions of the “Agile Manifesto” – views of the originators. In: Journal of Software Engineering Research and Development 6 (2018), Nr. 1, 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40411-018-0059-z

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/4979

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 216




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
In 2001, seventeen professionals set up the manifesto for agile software development. They wanted to define values and basic principles for better software development. On top of being brought into focus, the manifesto has been widely adopted by developers, in software-developing organizations and outside the world of IT. Agile principles and their implementation in practice have paved the way for radical new and innovative ways of software and product development. In parallel, the understanding of the manifesto’s underlying principles evolved over time. This, in turn, may affect current and future applications of agile principles. This article presents results from a survey and an interview study in collaboration with the original contributors of the manifesto for agile software development. Furthermore, it comprises the results from a workshop with one of the original authors. This publication focuses on the origins of the manifesto, the contributors’ views from today’s perspective, and their outlook on future directions. We evaluated 11 responses from the survey and 14 interviews to understand the viewpoint of the contributors. They emphasize that agile methods need to be carefully selected and agile should not be seen as a silver bullet. They underline the importance of considering the variety of different practices and methods that had an influence on the manifesto. Furthermore, they mention that people should question their current understanding of “agile” and recommend reconsidering the core ideas of the manifesto.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2018
Appears in Collections:Fakultät für Elektrotechnik und Informatik

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 115 53.24%
2 image of flag of United States United States 32 14.81%
3 image of flag of France France 11 5.09%
4 image of flag of China China 6 2.78%
5 image of flag of Peru Peru 5 2.31%
6 image of flag of Switzerland Switzerland 5 2.31%
7 image of flag of Europe Europe 4 1.85%
8 image of flag of Brazil Brazil 4 1.85%
9 image of flag of Sweden Sweden 3 1.39%
10 image of flag of Austria Austria 3 1.39%
    other countries 28 12.96%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse