Werner, F.A.; Homeier, J.; Oesker, M.; Boy, J.: Epiphytic biomass of a tropical montane forest varies with topography. In: Journal of Tropical Ecology 28 (2012), Nr. 1, S. 23-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467411000526
Zusammenfassung: | |
The spatial heterogeneity of tropical forest epiphytes has rarely been quantified in terms of biomass. In particular, the effect of topographic variation on epiphyte biomass is poorly known, although forests on ridges and ravines can differ drastically in stature and exposure. In an Ecuadorian lower montane forest we quantified epiphytic biomass along two gradients: (1) the twig-branch-trunk trajectory, and (2) the ridge-ravine gradient. Twenty-one trees were sampled in each of three forest types (ridge, slope, ravine positions). Their epiphytic biomass was extrapolated to stand level based on basal area-epiphyte load relationships, with tree basal areas taken from six plots of 400 m 2 each per forest type. Our results document the successional addition and partial replacement of lichens by bryophytes, angiosperms and finally dead organic matter along the twig-branch-trunk trajectory. Despite having the highest tree basal area, total epiphytic biomass (mean ± SD) of ravine forest was significantly lower (2.6 ± 0.7 Mg ha -1) than in mid-slope forest (6.3 ± 1.1 Mg ha -1) and ridge forest (4.4 ± 1.6 Mg ha -1), whereas maximum bryophyte water storage capacity was significantly higher. We attribute this pattern to differences in forest dynamics, stand structure and microclimate. Although our study could not differentiate between direct effects of slope position (nutrient availability, mesoclimate) and indirect effects (stand structure and dynamics), it provides evidence that fine-scale topography needs to be taken into account when extrapolating epiphytic biomass and related matter fluxes from stand-level data to the regional scale. © Copyright Cambridge University Press 2011. | |
Lizenzbestimmungen: | Es gilt deutsches Urheberrecht. Das Dokument darf zum eigenen Gebrauch kostenfrei genutzt, aber nicht im Internet bereitgestellt oder an Außenstehende weitergegeben werden. Dieser Beitrag ist aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich. |
Publikationstyp: | Article |
Publikationsstatus: | publishedVersion |
Erstveröffentlichung: | 2012 |
Die Publikation erscheint in Sammlung(en): | Naturwissenschaftliche Fakultät |
Pos. | Land | Downloads | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Anzahl | Proz. | |||
1 | Germany | 246 | 60,89% | |
2 | United States | 65 | 16,09% | |
3 | China | 13 | 3,22% | |
4 | No geo information available | 9 | 2,23% | |
5 | Japan | 5 | 1,24% | |
6 | India | 4 | 0,99% | |
7 | France | 4 | 0,99% | |
8 | Ecuador | 4 | 0,99% | |
9 | Brazil | 4 | 0,99% | |
10 | Anonymous Proxy | 4 | 0,99% | |
andere | 46 | 11,39% |
Hinweis
Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.