Wie deuten Wissenschaftlerinnen im Maschinenbau ihren Erfolg?

Download statistics - Document (COUNTER):

Barlösius, E.; Fisser, G.: Wie deuten Wissenschaftlerinnen im Maschinenbau ihren Erfolg? [How do female academics interpret their success?]. In: Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 18 (2017), Nr. 1, No. 1

Repository version

To cite the version in the repository, please use this identifier: https://doi.org/10.15488/1939

Selected time period:

year: 
month: 

Sum total of downloads: 283




Thumbnail
Abstract: 
Female students in mechanical engineering have better chances to achieve an academic career than women in other academic disciplines. In this article we reconstruct how female mechanical engineers interpret for themselves their success. Our reconstruction of the self-interpretations focusses on the "internal biographical mechanisms of regulation" (GIEGEL, 1988). The empirical material encompasses three qualitative primary data collections with female professors, female doctoral candidates, and female students of mechanical engineering. The methods used are narrative and problem-centered interviews. These primary data collections are then analyzed by applying the method of thematic coding. The analysis shows an extraordinarily high level of accordance between the three groups. The first accordance relates to family up-bringing, which was aimed at enabling the children to make individual decisions Further agree-ments concern: 1. biographical resources: a high level of self-confidence of being successful by realizing their own objectives; 2. the dominant interest in technology, based in the natural sciences; 3. the relation to the performance principle: the female mechanical engineers embrace great determination for perfor-mance as an essential basis for realizing one's own interests. These three dimensions specify their "internal biographical mechanism of regulation". It can be assumed that women who opt for mechanical engineering very often possess a distinct aspiration for success. Pre-sumably they would be successful in most other disciplines.
License of this version: CC BY 4.0 Unported
Document Type: Article
Publishing status: publishedVersion
Issue Date: 2017
Appears in Collections:Philosophische Fakultät

distribution of downloads over the selected time period:

downloads by country:

pos. country downloads
total perc.
1 image of flag of Germany Germany 203 71.73%
2 image of flag of United States United States 28 9.89%
3 image of flag of France France 9 3.18%
4 image of flag of Russian Federation Russian Federation 7 2.47%
5 image of flag of China China 7 2.47%
6 image of flag of Austria Austria 4 1.41%
7 image of flag of Ukraine Ukraine 3 1.06%
8 image of flag of Netherlands Netherlands 3 1.06%
9 image of flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic 3 1.06%
10 image of flag of Switzerland Switzerland 2 0.71%
    other countries 14 4.95%

Further download figures and rankings:


Hinweis

Zur Erhebung der Downloadstatistiken kommen entsprechend dem „COUNTER Code of Practice for e-Resources“ international anerkannte Regeln und Normen zur Anwendung. COUNTER ist eine internationale Non-Profit-Organisation, in der Bibliotheksverbände, Datenbankanbieter und Verlage gemeinsam an Standards zur Erhebung, Speicherung und Verarbeitung von Nutzungsdaten elektronischer Ressourcen arbeiten, welche so Objektivität und Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten sollen. Es werden hierbei ausschließlich Zugriffe auf die entsprechenden Volltexte ausgewertet, keine Aufrufe der Website an sich.

Search the repository


Browse