Home
→
Browsing by Subject

Browsing by Subject "peer review"

Now showing items 1-6 of 6

Evidence of research mastery: How applicants argue the feasibility of their research projects

Barlösius, Eva; Blem, Kristina (Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2021)

Although many studies have shown that reviewers particularly value the feasibility of a proposed project, very little attention has gone to how applicants try to establish the plausibility of their proposal’s realization. ...
Greetings from the editors

Schulenburg, Johann-Matthias Graf von der; Braun, Sebastian (Heidelberg : Springer Verlag, 2011)

[No abstract available]
Peer review’s irremediable flaws: Scientists’ perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany

Barlösius, Eva; Paruschke, Laura; Philipps, Axel (Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2023)

Peer review has developed over time to become the established procedure for assessing and assuring the scientific quality of research. Nevertheless, the procedure has also been variously criticized as conservative, biased, ...
Random grant allocation from the researchers’ perspective: Introducing the distinction into legitimate and illegitimate problems in Bourdieu’s field theory

Barlösius, Eva; Philipps, Axel (London [u.a.] : Sage, 2022)

Discussions about funding research grants by lottery have centered on weighing the pros and cons of peer review, but this focus does not fully account for how an idea comes across in the field of science to those researchers ...
Research funding randomly allocated? A survey of scientists' views on peer review and lottery

Philipps, Axel (Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2021)

The bold idea of random grant allocation is heatedly discussed as an alternative to peer review. The debate centers on advantages and disadvantages of the established measures to control scientific quality, compared to ...
Science rules! A qualitative study of scientists' approaches to grant lottery

Philipps, Axel (Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2020)

Using peer review to assess the validity of research proposals has always had its fair share of critics, including a more-than-fair-share of scholars. The debate about this method of assessing these proposals now seems ...

Now showing items 1-6 of 6

Submit new document to repository

Browse

All content
- Communities & Collections
- By Issue Date
- Authors
- Titles
- Subjects
- Subjects (GND)
- DDC
- License
- Type

My Account

Usage Statistics

of the Repository

Browsing by Subject "peer review"

Browsing by Subject "peer review"

Browse

All content

My Account

Usage Statistics